TV, BOOKS, MAGAZINES -- THE MIRACLE OF THE HUMAN BODY IS STUNNINGLY DISPLAYED.
THE MIRACLE OF THE HUMAN BODY REALLY PROVES SPECIAL CREATION!
WE INHABIT ONE -- WE SHOULD KNOW.
In a latter section, below, I put a stunning
quote from Molecular Biologist, Dr. Michael Denton, showing the extreme complexity of life.
However, we don't need to be rocket scientists to easily see the great handiwork of God, within arms reach.
We should not allow so-called scientists to bamboozle us with apparent technical rhetoric.
The works of God OBVIOUSLY prove he EXISTS and MADE EVERYTHING.
took a college course in "Systems Management."
An introductory comment
really caught my attention.
They said EXCELLENT MANAGEMENT is typified in
the HUMAN BODY.
OF COURSE, the absolute epitome of Systems Management.
Reach for a glass of water and many of the body's systems react immediately with perfect coordination and efficiency.
God made the optimum system - the human body - animals too of course.
computers make this management approach possible.
It has been said, the human
brain has more connections that all communication systems on earth combined.
maybe changing with the immensity of communication's growth.
Still, the human brain is a consummate miracle of creation.
has made the Christian Church to be the Body of Christ.
1 Corinthians 15:29
is quite interesting:
Else what shall they do which are baptized for the
dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
Of course, I disagree with the Mormon practice of baptizing live persons in place of dead persons.
But the more I have thought about it -- I think -- here is the deal --
of our bodies are frequently dying and being replaced by new cells.
I think -
likewise, cells (Christians who die) in the Body of Christ -- his actually existing spirit body -- are replaced by newly baptized
Christian believers (the symbolic entry to Christianity) in Christ's body.
as our bodies live on, with cells dying and being replaced by new ones.
body, the Church, (which is his completely real spirit body) continues on with dying cells being replaced by new ones.
So the Church is the absolute optimal organizational system for Jesus Christ to operate as supreme HEAD of his body,
There are many great truths to be grasped by reference to
For example, should we obey Christ, or church leaders, when there
is a conflict between them?
Referencing our bodies, our body parts always take
orders from our HEAD, although, our parts all work together, by direction of the head.
Our fingers are hooked together and our heads usually use them together in a coordinated manner,
But other-times, our head employs fingers independently.
But our head
is always the final authority. Same with Christ our HEAD.
The growing process is an obvious miracle of God's Special Creation.
completely overlook it, being so ordinary.
Imagine a car company making a car for a small child's
Christmas gift, that he, or she, could push around --
And then as he or she became
older, the car would grow, so he or she could sit in and pedal it --
And then when he or
she became 16, it would have grown so he or she could take driver's training in it and take his or her driver's
test in it --
And then when he or she married and got a family it would have grown into an
This is all absurd -- of course -- no engineer would even dream of such a thing.
But, that's what our bodies do -- all the complex systems and parts grow up in perfect harmony.
THE GROWING PROCESS IS AN OBVIOUS, WONDROUS MIRACLE OF GOD'S SPECIAL CREATION.
Information is absolutely required for all the innumerable operations of our
Information is essential for each minute step in the growing process
at all the innumerable places in the body that occurs.
Information is ALWAYS A "BRAIN
CHILD." IT ALWAYS COMES OUT OF SOMEONE'S BRAIN.
The computer programmer must devise in his or her
brain a flawless set of instructions, then encode it.
The low estimate for number of species on planet Earth
is 10 million, high estimate is 100 million.
All these organisms have genetic codes in the millions
or billions of letters (base pairs).
Realise that these all have made-to-match encodes and decodes, like a
matching key and lock set.
The existence of all this information means a super duper great brain exists
and made it.
This information PROVES GOD EXISTS AND MADE ALL LIVING THINGS.
We take all these miracles for granted so often. We owe God our utmost praise.
For we Seniors, just feeling super good is a miracle and God deserves lavish praise for this.
I have noticed that engineers are far more likely to be Creationists, than so-called pure scientists.
I think this is because engineers have their faces pushed up against the realities of the real, natural world.
When the computer engineer sees how much blood, sweat and tears must be put forth to achieve a great computer system,
he/she is most unlikely to view the human brain, or genetic system as an accident of cosmic evolution.
Those of us who have tried to make something in our workshops, can easily stand in awe as we take a close look, and
think hard on, the spectacular handiwork of God.
Dr. Michael Denton is Australian MD, but works in
molecular biology research. He likes Evolution, but admits real evidence really points to Creation.
HERE IS A QUOTE FROM DR. MICHAEL DENTON ABOUT THE INTRICACIES OF THE MOLECULAR WORLD.
DENTON IS AN AUSTRALIAN MD, BUT IS A RESEARCH TYPE MD.
Amazingly Denton IS NOT a Creationist –
he would like to fully embrace Evolution.
But, his book is titled, Evolution a Theory in Crisis.
He realizes – in researching molecular biology – that it SCREAMS -- SPECIAL CREATION -- and DISPROVES
His book dates from 1986, SO, obviously, molecular biology would be seen as even more
intricate today -- HE NOTES THIS.
His book, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis by Michael Denton mightily
"The Puzzle of Perfection. The intuitive feeling that pure chance
could never have achieved the degree of complexity and ingenuity so ubiquitous in nature has been a continuing source of skepticism
ever since the publication of the Origin of the Species; and throughout the past century there has always existed a significant
minority of first-rate biologists who have never been able to bring themselves to accept the validity of Darwinism.
Perhaps in no other area of modern biology is the challenge posed by the extreme complexity and ingenuity of biological
adaptations more apparent than in the fascinating new molecular world of the cell…To grasp the reality of life as it
has been revealed by molecular biology, we must magnify a cell a thousand million times until it is twenty kilometers in diameter
and resembles a giant airship large enough to cover a great city like London or New York.
we would then see would be an object of unparalleled complexity and adaptive design. On the surface of the cell we would
see millions of openings, like the port holes of a vast space ship, opening and closing to allow a continual stream of materials
to flow in and out. If we were to enter one of these openings we would find ourselves in a world of supreme technology
and bewildering complexity…….
is the sheer universality of perfection, the fact that everywhere we look, to whatever depth we look, we find an elegance
and ingenuity of an absolutely transcending quality, which so mitigates against the idea of chance. Is it really credible
that random processes could have constructed a reality, the smallest element of which – a functional protein or gene
– is complex beyond our own creative capacities, a reality which is the very antithesis of chance, which excels in every
sense anything produced by the intelligence of man?
Alongside the level of ingenuity and
complexity exhibited by the molecular machinery of life, even our most advanced artifacts appear clumsy. We feel humbled,
as Neolithic man would in the presence of twentieth-century technology.
The idea of evolution is the key-stone
of our modern world view. Yet the theory of evolution as propounded by Darwin and elaborated into accepted “fact”
by the scientific establishment is coming under increasing fire. This authoritative and remarkably accessible book by
a molecular biologist shows how rapidly accumulating evidence is threatening the basic assumptions of orthodox Darwinism.
Although the theory appears to be correct regarding the emergence of new species, its larger
claims to account for the relationship between classes and orders, let alone the origin of life, appear to be based on shaky
foundations at best. Not only has paleontology failed to come up with the fossil “missing links” which Darwin
anticipated, but the hypothetical reconstructions of major evolutionary developments --such as that linking birds to reptiles
– are beginning to look more like fantasies than serious conjectures.
Even the currently
popular theory of “punctuated equilibrium” cannot adequately fill in the real gaps we face when envisaging how
major groups of plants and animals arose. Most important of
all, the discoveries of molecular biologists, far from strengthening Darwin’s claims, are throwing more and more doubt
on traditional Darwinism.
At a fundamental level of molecular structure, each member of
a class seems equally representative of that class, and no species appear to be in any real sense “intermediate”
between two classes. Nature, in sum, appears to be profoundly discontinuous. It would be an illusion to think
that what we are aware of at present is any more than a fraction of the extent of biological design.
In practically every field of fundamental biological research ever increasing levels of design and complexity are
being revealed at an ever-accelerating rate. The credibility of natural selection is weakened, therefore, not only by
the perfection we have glimpsed but by the expectation of further as yet undreamt of depths of ingenuity and complexity.
To those who still dogmatically advocate that all this new reality is the result of pure chance one can only reply,
like Alice, incredulous in the face of the contradictory logic of the Red Queen: Alice laughed. “There’s
no use trying”, she said. “One can’t believe impossible things”. “I dare say you
haven’t had much practice,” said the queen. “When I was your age I did it for half an hour a day.
Why sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.”